A MODEL FOR ASSESSING QUALITY OF INFORMATIONAL AND EDUCATIONAL SYSTEM FOR SELF-LEARNING ORGANIZATIONS


Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

Corporate training is a tool to achieve short-term and long-term goals of the organization; it is viewed through the prism of the general development strategy. Implementation of corporate training at the organization ranges from one training specialist to creation of its own corporate university. Anyway, the ultimate goal is considered as the formation of a self-learning organization.

The authors explain the choice of instruments for corporate training which appears to be a mechanism for management of the employees’ new knowledge formation in a self-learning organization that is characterized by a group-project activity related to implementation and promotion of innovative ideas.

The paper outlines the peculiarities of corporate training at the self-learning organization and explains the choice of quality indicators that are typical for the processes of corporate training as a part of informational and educational system as a whole.

The authors reveal the concept of a self-learning organization and its features; suggest forming a knowledge-center of informational and educational system of the self-learning organization to control its positive dynamics. The knowledge-center of the informational and educational system is viewed by the authors as a set of distinctive competence, professional expertise, social competence and special competence of employees of a self-learning organization.

A special feature presented in the paper is the author's model for assessing the quality of corporate training of the company employees by monitoring the controlled parameters of the informational and educational system core effectiveness.

The paper assesses the contents of corporate training. The model contains eleven well-grounded quality indicators, each of which, in its turn, is an integral indicator. The novelty of the proposed solutions is that the quality issues of the knowledge transfer are discussed in the educational environment for the first time. Moreover, new are the methods for evaluation of the quality parameters arranged according to the robust design approach, widely used overseas for evaluating quality indicators in the management systems.

About the authors

Ludmila Vladimirovna Glukhova

V.N. Tatishchev Volzhsky University, Togliatti

Author for correspondence.
Email: prof.glv@ya.ru

Doctor of Sciences (Economics), Professor, professor of Chair “Management of Organization”

Russian Federation

Svetlana Dmitrievna Syrotyuk

Togliatti State University, Togliatti

Email: sirotyk_sd@mail.ru

PhD (Pedagogy), Associate Professor, assistant professor of Chair “Management of Organization”, doctoral candidate

Russian Federation

References

  1. Glukhova L.V., Gudkova S.A., Syrotyuk S.D. Metodologiya upravleniya transformatsiey organizatsii v samoobuchayushchuyusya sistemu [Methodology of management transformation of the organization in self-learning system]. Voronezh, Voronezhsky gosudarstvenny pedagogichesky universitet Publ., 2012, 148 p.
  2. Syrotyuk S.D. Designing of the information-educational system core of a learning organization. Vektor nauki Tolyattinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 2014, no. 3, pp. 327–330.
  3. Syrotyuk S.D. Learning organization as advanced form of competence of personnel. Vektor nauki Tolyattinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya Ekonomika i upravlenie, 2012, no. 2, pp. 72–77.
  4. Dubinenkova E.N. Organization of corporate training for the employees of an enterprise. Kuryer Vologodskoy torgovo-promyshlennoy palaty, 2003, no. 2, pp. 39–40.
  5. Karakozova N.Yu. In-house training as a resource for continuing education of teachers. Azimut nauchnykh issledovaniy: pedagogika i psikhologiya, 2014, no. 3, pp. 40–43.
  6. Khoreshman V.S. Motivation as a factor of students’ subject competences development. Izvestiya YuFU. Tekhnicheskie nauki, 2011, no. 10, pp. 151–157.
  7. Gainutdinova E.V. Cognitive approach in understanding the motivation phenomenon. XXI vek: itogi proshlogo i problemy nastoyashchego plyus, 2013, vol. 1, no. 11, pp. 173–180.
  8. Korotkova O. Learning and self-learning organization. Portal iTeam: Tekhnologii korporativnogo upravleniya. URL: iteam.ru/publications/human/section_67/article_985.
  9. Klyueva N.V. Team building as a condition for successful development and implementation of the project (from the working experience of a business consultant). Tsentr korporativnogo obucheniya i konsultirovaniya. URL: consult.uniyar.ac.ru/articles.html.
  10. Shchipanov V.V. Proektirovanie kvalitativnogo obrazovaniya inzhenera [Designing of the qualitative education of an engineer]. Tolyatti, Razvitie cherez obrazovanie Publ., 1997, 50 p.
  11. Chernova Yu.K., Shchipanov V.V., Krylova S.A. Matematicheskoe modelirovanie obrazovatelnykh protsessov [Mathematical modeling of educational processes]. Tolyatti, TGU Publ., 2005, 101 p.
  12. Adler Yu.P. Vvedenie v planirovanie eksperimenta [Introduction to experiment planning]. Moscow, Metallurgiya Publ., 1968, 155 p.
  13. Zubkov A.F., Ponomareva N.V., Zakharova T.V. Role and importance of professional competencies specialists with higher education of his successful career. XXI vek: itogi proshlogo i problemy nastoyashchego plyus, 2014, no. 4, pp. 127–132.
  14. Semyshkina S.P. Learning organization in theory and practice. URL: flm.su/_elements/magazine/view_full.
  15. Senge P. Pyataya distsiplina: iskusstvo i praktika samoobuchayushcheysya organizatsii [The fifth discipline. The art and practice of the learning organization]. Moscow, Olimp-biznes Publ., 1999, 406 p.
  16. Marikhin S.V. Psychological aspects of success in a professional activity. Mir cheloveka, 2009, no. 1, pp. 155–163.
  17. Chernova Yu.K. Upravlenie personalom predpriyatiya na osnove vnutrifirmennogo obucheniya [Human resource management based on corporate training]. Tolyatti, Kasandra Publ., 2012, 225 p.
  18. Akoff R. System analysis and education. Vestnik vysshey shkoly, 1990, no. 2, pp. 50–54.
  19. Syrotyuk S.D. Method of evaluation costs transformation of knowledge staff self-learning system. Vektor nauki Tolyattinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 2013, no. 1, pp. 370–376.
  20. Schipanov V.V., Aidarov D.V. The process approach and integrity of the quality management system. Izvestiya Samarskogo nauchnogo tsentra RAN, 2010, vol. 12, no. 4-4, pp. 795–801.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c)



This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies