EVALUATION OF FRACTURES AND STRUCTURES MORPHOLOGY IN CONSTRUCTION STEELS USING THE COMPUTERIZED PROCEDURES


Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

The absence of fast-acting, documented, objective procedures for structures and fractures measurement makes it difficult to compare inhomogeneity of their structure for identifying structure critical factors limiting the destruction. Therefore, the administrative decisions taken to improve the quality of metal products are often subjective what makes them ineffective, limiting their applying by the narrow circle of tasks. The application of suggested computerized procedures made it possible to perform bulk documented measurements of the construction steels structures and fractures images made in 2D and 3D examination scales. For more accurate identification of structures, they were observed within the same field using the optical, atomic-powered, scanning electron microscopy and electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD - analysis). The fracture relief was reconstructed from the bulk measurements of 2D and 3D geometry of tough fractures of steels with different types of structures (secondary sorbite, ferrite-perlite banded orientation, the residual portion of the fir-tree structure), testing schemes (drop-weight test, static tension test, and test when trepanning throughout the rolling directions, tangentially in forging). It allowed identifying the relief geometrical parameters determining the differences in the metal viscosity levels (a pit depth and diameter, the web thickness between the adjacent pits). To estimate the inhomogeneity of pits distribution in fracture the authors used the statistics of Voronoi polyhedra (the polyhedra distribution by areas, the number of neighbors and the distance between pits). The statistics of measurement results of the structures and fractures elements may be useful both for their identification and for updating the mechanisms of ductile and brittle fracture in structural steels (during the  direct comparison of structures and fractures) in order to identify the factors limiting the quality of metal. It is essential for the promotion of administrative decisions objectivity and efficiency while improving the consistent quality of multipurpose metal products.

About the authors

Aleksandr Viktorovich Kudrya

National University of Science and Technology MISiS, Moscow

Author for correspondence.
Email: AVKudrya@misis.ru

Doctor of Sciences (Engineering), Professor of Chair “Physical Metallurgy and Physics of Strength”

Russian Federation

Elina Aleksandrovna Sokolovskaya

National University of Science and Technology MISiS, Moscow

Email: sokolovskaya@misis.ru

PhD (Engineering), assistant professor of Chair “Physical Metallurgy and Physics of Strength”

Russian Federation

Hai Ninh Le

National University of Science and Technology MISiS, Moscow

Email: lehaininh2003@yahoo.com

postgraduate student of Chair “Physical Metallurgy and Physics of Strength”

Russian Federation

Viktor Aleksandrovich Trachenko

National University of Science and Technology MISiS, Moscow

Email: trachenko.v.a@gmail.com

postgraduate student of Chair “Physical Metallurgy and Physics of Strength”

Russian Federation

Sergei Valerievich Skorodumov

National University of Science and Technology MISiS, Moscow

Email: kharovsk@mail.ru

PhD (Engineering), engineer of the first category, Academic center “International school of microscopy”

Russian Federation

Kseniya Borisovna Papina

Moscow city center for study of physical and mechanical properties of structural materials of OAO «MOSGAZ», Moscow

Email: fake@neicon.ru

leading engineer of Laboratory of chemical and structural analysis

Russian Federation

Hyu Chuong Chinh

National University of Science and Technology MISiS, Moscow

Email: chuongmisis09@gmail.com

student

Russian Federation

References

  1. Krupin Yu.A., Sukhova V.G. Kompyuternaya metallografiya [Computer metal-lography]. Moscow, MISiS Publ., 2009. 88 p.
  2. Sokolovskaya E.A. On the results reproducibility of structures and fractures measurements using computerized procedures. Voprosy materialovedeniya, 2013, no. 4, pp. 143–153.
  3. Kudrya A.V., Shtremel M.A. Reliability of data analysis in quality control. Metallovedenie i termicheskaya obrabotka metallov, 2010, no. 7, pp. 50–55.
  4. Klevtsov G.V., Merson E.D. On the possibility of confocal laser scanning mi-croscopy for investigation of metallic materials fracture surfaces. Fundamentalnye is-sledovaniya, 2012, no. 11-5, pp. 1185–1188.
  5. Merson E.D., Krishtal M.M., Merson D.L., Eremichev A.A., Vinogradov A.Yu. The study of stages of destruction of high-carbon steel embrittled by hydrogen using the method of acoustic emission. Deformatsiya i razrushenie materialov, 2012, no. 9, pp. 41–48.
  6. Khanzhin V.G., Shtremel’ M.A. Quantitative information on fracture processes obtained by measurement of acoustic emission. Metallovedenie i termicheskaya obrabotka metallov, 2009, no. 5, pp. 53–59.
  7. Kudrya A.V., Markov E.A. Quantitative evaluation of destruction according to the acoustic emission in various measuring scales. Materialovedenie, 2007, no. 1, pp. 13–18.
  8. Smirnov M.A., Pyshmintsev I.Y., Boryakova A.N. Classification of low-carbon pipe steel microstructures. Metallurgist, 2010, no. 7-8, pp. 444–454.
  9. Shtremel M.A. Razrushenie. Kniga 1. Razrushenie materiala [Destruction. Book 1. Material destruction]. Moscow, MISiS Publ., 2014. 670 p.
  10. Shtremel M.A. Razrushenie. Kniga 2. Razrushenie struktur [Destruction. Book 2. Structures destruction]. Moscow, MISiS Publ., 2015. 976 p.
  11. Goritsky V.M. Diagnostika materialov [Materials diagnostics]. Moscow, Met-allurgizdat Publ., 2004. 408 p.
  12. Fonshteyn N.M., Bronfin B.M., Shifman A.Z., Zhukova Ye.N., Bortsov A.N. Quantitative microfractographic analysis of ductile fracture in low alloyed steels. Physics of Metals and Metallography, 1982, vol. 53, no. 1, pp. 157–162.
  13. Tarasevich Yu.Yu. Perkolyatsiya: teoriya, prilozheniya, algoritmy [Percolation: theory, applications, algorithms]. Moscow, URSS Publ., 2002. 112 p.
  14. Nikitin Ya.Yu. Asimptoticheskaya effektivnost neparametricheskikh kriteriev [Asymptotic efficiency of distribution-free tests]. Moscow, Fizmatlit Publ., 1995. 240 p.
  15. Kudrya A.V., Sokolovskaya E.A., Arsenkin A.M. The efficiency of application of N-dimensional observation tools for the analysis of ductile fracture morphology of heat treatable steels. Deformatsiya i razrushenie materialov, 2010, no. 1, pp. 38–44.
  16. Shtremel M.A. Prochnost splavov. Chast’ 2. Deformatsiya [Alloys strength. P. 2. Deformation]. Moscow, MISiS Publ., 1997. 528 p.
  17. Chentsov N.N. Statisticheskie reshayushchie pravila i optimalnye vyvody [De-cision functions and effective conclusions]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1972. 524 p.
  18. Kudrya A.V., Sokolovskaya E.A. Non-uniformity of different scaled structures and fracture toughness of structural steels. Izvestiya Rossiyskoy Akademii nauk. Seriya fizicheskaya, 2004, vol. 68, no. 10, pp. 1495–1502.
  19. Gudkov A.A. Treshchinostoykost’ stali [Resistance of steel to cracking]. Mos-cow, Metallurgiya Publ., 1989. 376 p.
  20. Matvienko Yu.G. Modeli i kriterii mekhaniki razrusheniya [Patterns and crite-ria of fracture mechanics]. Moscow, Fizmatlit Publ., 2006. 328 p.
  21. Cherepanov G.P. Mekhanika razrusheniya kompozitsionnykh materialov [Frac-ture mechanics of composite materials]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1983. 295 p.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c)



This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies