LEXICAL SETS OF TZAR-DERIVATIVES


Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

The phenomenon of compounding, the reasons for writing words as one solid word or hyphenated, functional activity of compound nouns with evaluative or associative components, structural types of compound words, and other issues attract the attention of scientists-linguists. Currently, the Russian discourse fixes high frequency of the tzar-derivatives – words with an indeclinable evaluative component tzar- (Tzar-product, Tzar-bag, Tzar-tree, Tzar-girl, etc.). It is caused by the tendency to analyze and to the fact that tzar-derivatives represent the Russian linguistic picture of the world, which reflects a human holistic view of the surrounding reality. Increasing the number of lexical units in the vocabulary, the activity of tzar-derivatives and the need for their systematization determine the relevance of the study. The concept of “lexical set” is serving as a unit of systematization. The paper reveals distinctive features of a lexical set as a kind of semantic field. It emphasizes the fact that topical classification (extra-linguistic) is associated with the classification into lexical-semantic groups (linguistic). The classification of tzar-derivatives is defined, the following five lexical sets are described: “A person – non-person”, “Unique items”, “Nature and its components”, “Spiritual sphere and its components”, “Nominations in advertising”, each which includes several subgroups. The most extensive lexical set is revealed. It is proved that, as a result of transnomination, tzar-derivatives can be produced within a lexical set “Nominations in advertising”. The author emphasizes that the units of the four groups: “A person – non-person”, “Unique items”, “Nature and its components”, “Spiritual sphere and its components” are characterized by contextual synonymy. To achieve the goals of the work, a set of complementary research methods was used.

About the authors

Natalia Viktorovna Gonnova

Samara Regional Institute of Advanced Vocational Training and Professional Development of Educators, Samara

Author for correspondence.
Email: rectorat@sipkro.ru

senior lecturer of Chair of Primary education

Russian Federation

References

  1. Kochetkova T.I. Slovoslozhenie kak sredstvo nominatsii i predikatsii v sovremennom russkom yazyke [Compounding as a means of nomination and predication in the modern Russian language]. Orenburg, OGPU Publ., 2004. 288 p.
  2. Senichkina E.P., Tikhonova R.I. Blends acting as euphemisms. Ratsionalnoe i emotsionalnoe v yazyke i rechi: sredstva i sposoby vyrazheniya. Moscow, MGOU Publ., 2004, pp. 96–98.
  3. Suhoparova M.A. Compound names in the modern Russian language (based on periodical newspaper material). Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo oblastnogo universiteta. Seriya: Russkaya filologiya, 2008, no. 3, pp. 130–136.
  4. Gurchiani M.T. Origin of composites in modern Russian. Sbornik nauchno-metodicheskikh rabot “Lingvisticheskie issledovaniya”. Kazan, KGTU Publ., 2009, pp. 67–69.
  5. Karelskaya E.N. Rating component of conjoin complex words as one of means of mentality Russian expression. Mir nauki, kultury, obrazovaniya, 2010, no. 2, pp. 200–201.
  6. Ivanova T.K. Slozhnye naimenovaniya litsa kak edinitsy sopostavitelnogo analiza [Compound naming of a person as a unit for comparative analysis]. Kazan, Kazanskiy universitet Publ., 2011. 178 p.
  7. Cherkasova A.A. Structural-semantic classification of bilexemes. Vestnik Irkutskogo gosudarstvennogo lingvisticheskogo universiteta, 2012, vol. 1, no. 17, pp. 69–74.
  8. Gabdreeva N.V., Gurchiani M.T. Slovar’ kompozitov russkogo yazyka noveyshego perioda [Dictionary of Russian language composites of the latest period]. Moscow, FLINTA Publ., 2012. 280 p.
  9. Goldin V.E. About a fact of learning thematic groups of words. Yazyk i obshchestvo. Saratov, 1970, issue 2, pp. 163–175.
  10. Filin F.P. Ocherki po teorii yazykoznaniya [Essays on the theory of linguistics]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1982. 336 p.
  11. Karaulov Yu.N. Obshchaya i russkaya ideografiya [General and Russian ideography]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1976. 356 p.
  12. Denisov P.N. Leksika russkogo yazyka i printsipy ee opisaniya [The vocabulary of the Russian language and the principles of its description]. Moscow, Russkiy yazyk Publ., 1980. 254 p.
  13. Shmelev D.N. Problemy semanticheskogo analiza leksiki: na materiale russkogo yazyka [Problems of vocabulary semantic analysis: on the material of the Russian language]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1973. 280 p.
  14. Akhmanova O.S. Slovar’ lingvisticheskikh terminov [Dictionary of linguistic terms]. 2nd ed. Moscow, Sovetskaya entsiklopediya Publ., 1969. 608 p.
  15. Ufimtseva A.A. Opyt izucheniya leksiki kak sistemy (na materiale angliyskogo yazyka) [The experience of studying vocabulary as a system (based on the English language)]. Moscow, AN SSSR Publ., 1962. 288 p.
  16. Vasilyev L.M. Semantic field theory. Voprosy yazykoznaniya, 1971, no. 5, pp. 105–113.
  17. Shmelev D.N. Sovremenny russkiy yazyk. Leksika [Modern Russian language. Vocabulary]. Moscow, Prosveshchenie Publ., 1977. 335 p.
  18. Levitskiy V.V. Types of lexical microsystems and criteria for their differentiation. Filologicheskie nauki, 1988, no. 5, pp. 66–72.
  19. Ippolitova A.B. Russkie rukopisnye travniki XVII–XVIII vekov: issledovanie folklora i etnobotaniki [Russian handwritten herbalists of the XVII–XVIII centuries: the study of folklore and ethnobotany]. Moscow, Indrik Publ., 2008. 512 p.
  20. Podolskaya N.V. Slovar’ russkoy onomasticheskoy terminologii [Dictionary of Russian onomastic terminology]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1988. 187 p.
  21. Historical places of Perm. URL: infomir59.ru/help/dostoprimechatelnosti/historical.
  22. Tsar-valenok. URL: sovross.ru/articles/847/14126.
  23. Tsar-frog. URL: yuchansson.blogspot.ru/2015/08/blog-post_621.html.
  24. Tsar-cutlet. URL: kotletar.ru/about/tsarkotl/index.aspx.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c)



This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies