GENRE VS DISCOURSE: CONCERNING THE NOTIONS RELATIONSHIP


Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

The paper considers the dialectical relations of two categories – genre and discourse, which are not definitely interpreted in the modern linguistic research. The author notes that the concept of genre is widely used in the discursive analysis; however, the genre problematics is still unexplored. The goal of this work is the consideration of interrelation of genre and discourse, the identification of their touch points. The paper analyses three main approaches to the notion of a genre – extralinguistic, structural and formal. The author comes to the conclusion that only the combination of extralinguistic and linguistic parameters will allow defining the notion of the genre more exactly and drawing the line between genre and discourse. The paper highlights the inconsistency of efforts to identify genre and discourse. Basing on M. Foucault’s concept, the author explains that discourse is constituted by the complex system of limitations imposed by the discursive structure, when the genre is defined by the creative potential. The term “discourse” covers certain spheres of discursive practices, the boundaries of which can be defined by the separation of their class features, and the term “genre” is used to define the invariant properties of the discursive practices. The author notes that genre acts as a flexible category of discursive activity, means of discourse ordering. The genre is not only the classification system of discursive practices or some formula of language structures but, first of all, the communicative phenomenon reflecting the process and the result of the discursive activity. 

About the authors

Olga Aleksandrovna Krapivkina

Irkutsk National Research Technical University, Irkutsk

Author for correspondence.
Email: koa1504@mail.ru

PhD (Philology), Associate Professor, assistant professor of Chair of Foreign Languages

Russian Federation

References

  1. Karasik V.I. Yazykovoy krug: lichnost, kontsepty, diskurs [Language circle: person, concepts, discourse]. Moscow, Gnozis Publ., 2004. 390 p.
  2. Schaeffer J.-M. Qu’est-ce qu’un genre littéraire? Paris, Hachette Livre Publ., 1989. 188 p.
  3. Leyderman N.L. Teoriya zhanra [Theory of genre]. Ekaterinburg, Slovesnik Publ., 2010. 906 p.
  4. Dementev V.V. Teoriya rechevykh zhanrov [The theory of speech genres]. Moscow, Znak Publ., 2010. 600 p.
  5. Alefirenko N.F. The theory of speech genres and pragmatics of discourse. Vestnik Kemerovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 2012, no. 4, pp. 16–21.
  6. Dolinin K.A. The issue of speech genres within 45 years after Bakhtin’s article. Rusistika: lingvisticheskaya paradigma kontsa XX veka. Sankt Petersburg, SPbU Publ., 1998, pp. 35–46.
  7. Shmeleva T.V. Model speech genre. Zhanry rechi. Saratov, Kolledzh Publ., 1997, pp. 88–98.
  8. Fairclough N. The dialectics of discourse. Lancaster university. URL: ling.lancs.ac.uk/ staff/norman/2001a.doc.
  9. Sheffer Zh.-M. Chto takoe literaturnyy zhanr? [What is a literary genre?]. Moscow, Editorial URSS Publ., 2010. 192 p.
  10. Chernets I.V. Literaturnye zhanry: problemy tipologii i poetiki [Literary genres: the problems of typology and poetics]. Moscow, MGU Publ., 1982. 191 p.
  11. Kaishna N.V. Zhanr kak khudozhestvennaya kategoriya [Genre as an artistic category]. Moscow, Znanie Publ., 1984. 64 p.
  12. Allen R. Bursting bubbles: “Soap opera” audiences and the limits of genre. Remote control: television, audiences and cultural power. London, Routledge Publ., 1989, pp. 44–55.
  13. Derrida J. Acts of literature. New York, Routledge Publ., 1992. 574 p.
  14. Kibrik A.A. Modus, genre and other parameters of discourse classification. Voprosy yazykoznaniya, 2009, no. 2, pp. 3–21.
  15. Swales J. Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press Publ., 1990. 260 p.
  16. Bhatia V.K. Analyzing genre: language use in professional settings. London, Longman House Publ., 1993. 246 p.
  17. Bernal C.L. A speech act analysis of judicial decisions. European journal of legal studies, 2007, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 1–24.
  18. Tyupa V.I. Genre and discourse. Kritika i semiotika, 2011, no. 15, pp. 31–42.
  19. Fuko M. Poryadok diskursa. Volya k istine: po tu storonu znaniya, vlasti i seksualnosti. Raboty raznykh let [The will to truth: on the other side of knowledge, power and sexuality. Works of different years]. Moscow, Kastal' Publ., 1996. 448 p.
  20. Bakhtin M.M. Estetika slovesnogo tvorchestva [Aesthetics of verbal creation]. Moscow, Khudozhestvennaya literatura Publ., 1979. 341 p.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c)



This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies