THE MAIN APPROACHES TO SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY OF BUSINESS: HISTORY AND MODERN TIMES


Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

The paper studies theoretical aspects of corporate social responsibility of modern business. The author believes that some entrepreneurs in their daily work activities are characterized more as “socially irresponsible”. The paper examines sociological theories containing approaches to social responsibility of those researchers who consider success, especially financial one, to be the justification for the deviation, and assume that an increase in the degree of irresponsibility of a capitalist depends on the estimated income, who explain the degree of responsibility of the Protestant entrepreneurs by their religion and behaviour ethics. The author shows the differences in understanding of the social responsibility by entrepreneurs depending on the religion, European and American models of social responsibility. The paper reveals the prerequisites for the emergence of the socially responsible behavior of Western entrepreneurs, examines the emergence of corporate social responsibility in our country through the socially significant behavior of merchants in pre-revolutionary Russia. The features of modern formation of the socially responsible entrepreneurship are described, as well as the attitude of the modern entrepreneurial community and non-entrepreneurial population to the activity consistent with the principles of corporate social responsibility. One of the indicators of corporate social responsibility of an enterprise is the preparation and publication of a social non-financial report in accordance with international and Russian standards. The author gives examples of modern socially responsible national and foreign companies operating in the Russian market and publishing such reports. The paper analyzes the contents of social reports, examples of socially responsible activities in relation to employees and the local community. The necessity of increasing the number of Russian socially responsible companies, especially in small and medium-sized business, is emphasized.

About the authors

Roman Vyacheslavovich Dmitriev

Penza State University, Penza

Author for correspondence.
Email: mitrioman2008@rambler.ru

postgraduate student of Chair “Sociology and Human Resources Management”

Russian Federation

References

  1. Dmitriev R.V. The capitalist spirit of Protestantism in sociology of M. Weber. Universitetskoe obrazovanie (MKUO-2016): sbornik statey XX Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-metodicheskoy konferentsii. Penza, PenGU Publ., 2016, pp. 320–321.
  2. Marks K. Kapital. Kritika politicheskoy ekonomii [Capital. Criticism of political economy]. Moscow, Slovo Publ., 2009. 534 p.
  3. Merton R. Sotsialnaya teoriya i sotsialnaya struktura [Social Theory and Social Structure]. Moscow, AST Publ., 2006. 873 p.
  4. Ivanova T.N. Social and labor mobility and skill orientation of young people in the context of the theory of structuralism. Vektor nauki Tolyattinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Pedagogika, psikhologiya, 2015, no. 2, pp. 59–63.
  5. Veber M. Protestant ethics and the spirit of capitalism. Izbrannye proizvedeniya. Moscow, Progress Publ., 1990, pp. 220–230.
  6. Veber M. Protestant sects and the spirit of capitalism. Izbrannye proizvedeniya. Moscow, Progress Publ., 1990, pp. 273–276.
  7. Zombart V. Burzhua [Bourgeois]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1994. 443 p.
  8. Sobolevskaya A. Spiritual origins of Russian business. Voprosy ekonomiki, 1995, no. 8, pp. 88–96.
  9. Timofeev V.V. Russkie staroobryadtsy v XVIII–XX vv.: opyt predprinimatelskoy deyatelnosti i obshchestvennogo sluzheniya v Rossii i za rubezhom [Russian old believers in the XVIII–XX centuries: experience in business and public service in Russia and abroad]. Cheboksary, Cheboksarskiy filial MGOPU im. M.A. Sholokhova Publ., 2006. 373 p.
  10. Kosharnaya G.B., Dmitriev R.V. The value of Protestantism and of the old believers for the development of entrepreneurship. Sotsiologiya i obshchestvo: sotsialnoe neravenstvo i sotsialnaya spravedlivost: materialy V Vserossiyskogo sotsiologicheskogo kongressa. Moscow, Rossiyskoe obshchestvo sotsiologov Publ., 2016, pp. 2590–2607.
  11. Kosharnaya G.B. Social responsibility of entrepreneural subjects: history and modern times. Izvestiya vysshikh uchebnykh zavedeniy. Povolzhskiy region. Obshchestvennye nauki, 2014, no. 1, pp. 100–108.
  12. Kosharnaya G.B., Vasyanin M.S. Social responsibility of business entities as a factor of stability of the Russian society. Traditsionnoe, sovremennoe i perekhodnoe v rossiyskom obshchestve: sbornik statey Kh Vserossiyskoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii. Penza, Privolzhskiy Dom znaniy Publ., 2012, pp. 27–30.
  13. Carnegie A. The gospel of wealth. Cultural contexts for critical thinking and writing. Boston, St. Martin’s Publ., 1991, pp. 22–27.
  14. Ford G. Moya zhizn, moi dostizheniya [My life, my achievements]. Moscow, Mann, Ivanov i Ferber Publ., 2013. 285 p.
  15. Fridman M. Kapitalizm i svoboda [Capitalism and Freedom]. Moscow, Novoe izdatelstvo Publ., 2002. 168 p.
  16. Bowen Н. Social Responsibilities of the Businessman. New York, Harper & Row Publ., 1953. 386 p.
  17. Davis K. Can Business Afford To Ignore Social Responsibilities? California Management Review, 1960, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 70–76.
  18. Caroll A. The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organization stakeholders. Business Horizons, 1991, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 39–48.
  19. Frieman M. The Social Responsibility of Business Is to Increase Its Profits. New York Times Magazine, 1970, 13 September.
  20. Smit K. Etika marketinga [Ethics of marketing]. Sankt Petersburg, Piter Publ., 2012. 464 p.
  21. Social entrepreneurship as a form of civic engagement and strategies for crisis behavior. URL: corp.fom.ru/uploads/files/Socpredprinimatelstvo.pdf.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c)



This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies