AUTHOR’S MODALITY AS A MARKER OF THE TERM FORMATION STAGE


Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

The relevance of this work is caused, firstly, by the selection of study material, which is the English-language nanotechnology discourse. The selected discipline segment is developing at a quick pace that causes the dynamism of the term formation processes and the possibility to trace them in real-time mode. Moreover, the parameters of the author’s modality in the scientific text were being studied only fragmentarily that proves the necessity of their analysis. The paper covers the consideration of the author’s modality actualization in the text and its direct relationship with the stages of the term formation. During the study, the author carried out the chronological analysis of the English-language scientific articles covering a single subject matter (in particular, related to the scanning tunneling microscopy) in order to identify the means of expressing the author’s modality used in them. At the same time, the author makes an attempt to associate logically the application of these means with the period of development of a scientific object and, consequently, with the stage of formation of a term nominating it. In the paper, special attention is paid to the application of modal verbs, modal adjectives and adverbs characterized by the highest frequency of use in the English-language nanotechnology text. During the analysis, the author identified the means of expressing the author’s modality marking the specific stage of a term development and proposed the model of scientific article text construction based on the used author’s modality means. It is concluded that the new knowledge and the terminological unit actualizing it undergo the identical stages of formation that, in the text of scientific work, is reflected in the semantics of means used to express the author’s modality and their concentration in the structure of the text.  

About the authors

Tatyana Viktorovna Aksenova

Ogarev Mordovia State University, Saransk

Author for correspondence.
Email: tatyana.yashina88@gmail.com

senior lecturer of Chair of English Philology

Russian Federation

References

  1. Svoykin K.B. Smyslovaya dialogicheskaya konvergentsiya v nauchnoy kommunikatsii [Semantic conversational convergence in scientific communication]. Saransk, Mordovskiy universitet Publ., 2004. 115 p.
  2. Korovina I.V., Svoykin K.B. The markers of speech producer’s authorship in scientific discourse in Russian, English and French (aspect of translation). Mezhvuzovskiy sbornik nauchnykh trudov “Lingvisticheskie i ekstralingvisticheskie problemy kommunikatsii: teoreticheskie i prikladnye aspekty”. Saransk, 2016, pp. 46–50.
  3. Galperin I.R. Tekst kak objekt lingvisticheskogo issledovaniya [Text as an object of linguistic study]. Moscow, KomKniga Publ., 2006. 144 p.
  4. Valgina N.S. Teoriay teksta [Text theory]. Moscow, Logos Publ., 2003. 280 p.
  5. Vaulina S.S., Devina O.V. Author’s modality as a text forming category (posing the problem). Vestnik Rossiyskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta im. I. Kanta. Seriya: Filologicheskie nauki, 2010, no. 8, pp. 8–13.
  6. Chibuk A.V. The writer’s modality expression means in political journalism texts (based on the Germany’s media). Vestnik Voennogo universiteta, 2010, no. 4, pp. 128–133.
  7. Kranich S. Epistemic modality in English popular scientific texts and their German translations. Zeitschrift für Translationswissenschaft und Fachkommunikation, 2009, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 26–41.
  8. Kurenkova A.V. Means of expressing modality in scientific text (using the Russian and English texts). Sbornik materialov XV Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii “Kommunikativnye aspekty yazyka i kultury”. Tomsk, 2015. Part 1, pp. 102–108.
  9. Wolf L., Cohen A. Modal Adverbs as Negotiation Chips. International Journal for Language Data Processing, Sprache und Datenverabeitung, 2009, vol. 33, no. 1-2, pp. 169–177.
  10. Alimuradov O.A., Latu M.N., Razduev A.V. Osobennosti struktury i funktsionirovaniya otraslevykh terminosistem (na primere terminosistemy nanotekhnologiy) [Structural and performance features of the industry-specific term systems (using the example of nanotechnology term system)]. Pyatigorsk, SNEG Publ., 2012. 128 p.
  11. Razduev A.V. Nanotechnology discourse as a type of scientific discourse (Based on the material of the modern English language). Vestnik Chelyabinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 2013, no. 37, pp. 52–55.
  12. Krasnova T.I. Subyektivnost – Modalnost (materialy aktivnoy grammatiki) [Subjectivity – Modality (active grammar materials)]. Sankt Petersburg, SPbGUEF Publ., 2002. 189 p.
  13. Van Linden A. Modal Adjectives. English Deontic and Evaluative Constructions in Diachrony and Synchrony. Berlin, De Gruyter, 2012. 383 p.
  14. Young R., Ward J., Scire F. The topographiner: an instrument for measuring surface microtopography. The Review of Scientific Instruments, 1972, vol. 43, no. 7, pp. 999–1011.
  15. Villarurubia J.S., Young R.D., Scire F., Teague E.C., Gadzuk J.W. The topographiner: an instrument for measuring surface microtopography. A Century of Excellence in Measurements, Standards, and Technology: A Chronicle of Selected NBS/NIST Publications, 1901–2000. USA, 2001, pp. 214–218.
  16. Binnig G., Rohrer H. Scanning tunneling microscopy. Surface Science, 1983, vol. 126, no. 1-3, pp. 236–244.
  17. Rost M.J., Crama L., Schakel P. Scanning probe microscopes go video rate and beyond. Review of Scientific Instruments, 2005, vol. 76, no. 5, pp. 2–10.
  18. Lapshin R.V. Drift-insensitive distributed calibration of probe microscope scanner in nanometer range: Virtual mode. Applied Surface Science, 2016, vol. 378, pp. 530–539.
  19. Ratner M. Nanotechnology: A gentle introduction to the next big idea. New Jersey, Prentice Hall, 2002. 133 p.
  20. Gogotsi Yu. Nanomaterials Handbook. London, New York, CRC Press, 2006. 800 p.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c)



This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies